<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 1202 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279359</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal concerning exemption u/s. 54F of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal ruled that the purchase of a residential house within the specified period is the key requirement for claiming exemption, regardless of the source of funds used for the investment. The decision emphasized that the Act does not mandate using the same funds from the sale of assets for purchasing the new house, as long as the time frame for investment is met.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2019 15:44:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=562809" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 1202 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279359</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal concerning exemption u/s. 54F of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal ruled that the purchase of a residential house within the specified period is the key requirement for claiming exemption, regardless of the source of funds used for the investment. The decision emphasized that the Act does not mandate using the same funds from the sale of assets for purchasing the new house, as long as the time frame for investment is met.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279359</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>