<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 702 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376681</link>
    <description>The court quashed the Settlement Commission&#039;s orders for violating Section 245D(2C) by considering objections beyond the Principal Commissioner&#039;s report and breaching natural justice principles. The applications were remanded to the Commission for fresh review within fifteen days, without prior influence. Implementation of the ruling was suspended for four weeks for potential appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2019 10:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=562772" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 702 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376681</link>
      <description>The court quashed the Settlement Commission&#039;s orders for violating Section 245D(2C) by considering objections beyond the Principal Commissioner&#039;s report and breaching natural justice principles. The applications were remanded to the Commission for fresh review within fifteen days, without prior influence. Implementation of the ruling was suspended for four weeks for potential appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376681</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>