<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 700 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376679</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal in part, ruling in favor of the assessee on the issue of deductions under Section 54/54F for both residential units and rejecting the improper reference to the DVO for revaluation of fair market value. Other decisions made by the CIT(A) were upheld. The order was pronounced on 12/03/2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2019 16:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=562766" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 700 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376679</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal in part, ruling in favor of the assessee on the issue of deductions under Section 54/54F for both residential units and rejecting the improper reference to the DVO for revaluation of fair market value. Other decisions made by the CIT(A) were upheld. The order was pronounced on 12/03/2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376679</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>