<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 696 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376675</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The decision was based on the invalidity of the penalty notice, which failed to specify the exact charge, following precedents emphasizing the necessity for clear and specific notices. The judgment highlighted the importance of specificity in penalty notices for ensuring fairness and adherence to principles of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2019 09:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=562761" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 696 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376675</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The decision was based on the invalidity of the penalty notice, which failed to specify the exact charge, following precedents emphasizing the necessity for clear and specific notices. The judgment highlighted the importance of specificity in penalty notices for ensuring fairness and adherence to principles of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376675</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>