<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 676 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376655</link>
    <description>The Bombay High Court determined it lacked jurisdiction to entertain an appeal against an order from the ITAT Bangalore Bench. The court held that the Karnataka High Court should have jurisdiction over the appeal based on the location of the Tribunal that passed the order. The appeal was directed to be filed in the Karnataka High Court, upholding the respondent&#039;s objection.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2019 16:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=562729" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 676 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376655</link>
      <description>The Bombay High Court determined it lacked jurisdiction to entertain an appeal against an order from the ITAT Bangalore Bench. The court held that the Karnataka High Court should have jurisdiction over the appeal based on the location of the Tribunal that passed the order. The appeal was directed to be filed in the Karnataka High Court, upholding the respondent&#039;s objection.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376655</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>