<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 664 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376643</link>
    <description>The appeals were accepted by the CESTAT despite the delay in filing due to penalties below the prescribed limit of Rs. 2 lakhs. The appellants demonstrated justifiable grounds for the delay, including financial constraints and the risk to their credibility as exporters. The court observed the substantial duty demands confirmed against the original company and individuals, supporting the need for appeal. The appellants offered to compensate for the delay by paying costs to the respondent department, leading to the condonation of the delay upon payment of Rs. 2000 each. The appeals were permitted for hearing within 30 days upon prompt payment of costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2019 08:16:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=562713" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 664 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376643</link>
      <description>The appeals were accepted by the CESTAT despite the delay in filing due to penalties below the prescribed limit of Rs. 2 lakhs. The appellants demonstrated justifiable grounds for the delay, including financial constraints and the risk to their credibility as exporters. The court observed the substantial duty demands confirmed against the original company and individuals, supporting the need for appeal. The appellants offered to compensate for the delay by paying costs to the respondent department, leading to the condonation of the delay upon payment of Rs. 2000 each. The appeals were permitted for hearing within 30 days upon prompt payment of costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376643</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>