<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 1858 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279344</link>
    <description>A non-party cannot pursue an appeal against an injunction order without leave of the appellate court when it is not yet on record, so the challenge to the injunction was not maintainable. An operative civil court injunction restraining proceedings before BIFR could not be ignored by the tribunal on its own view that the order was void; until set aside or vacated, it remained binding, and the BIFR proceedings were treated as stayed and of no legal consequence. Where a Member had earlier recused himself, his return to the same matter raised a reasonable apprehension of bias, so further participation was disallowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2019 07:43:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=562697" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 1858 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279344</link>
      <description>A non-party cannot pursue an appeal against an injunction order without leave of the appellate court when it is not yet on record, so the challenge to the injunction was not maintainable. An operative civil court injunction restraining proceedings before BIFR could not be ignored by the tribunal on its own view that the order was void; until set aside or vacated, it remained binding, and the BIFR proceedings were treated as stayed and of no legal consequence. Where a Member had earlier recused himself, his return to the same matter raised a reasonable apprehension of bias, so further participation was disallowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279344</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>