<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1539 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279354</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the rejection of a refund claim as time-barred under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal held that Section 11B does not apply to refund claims for service tax not required to be paid by the appellant. Consequently, the appellant was granted the refund claim without limitations imposed by Section 11B, providing consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2019 07:43:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=562690" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1539 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279354</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the rejection of a refund claim as time-barred under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal held that Section 11B does not apply to refund claims for service tax not required to be paid by the appellant. Consequently, the appellant was granted the refund claim without limitations imposed by Section 11B, providing consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279354</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>