https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279355 The disputed mark-to-market loss on foreign exchange forward contracts was not restored because the issue had already been decided by an earlier Bombay HC ruling in favour of the assessee. On that basis, the proposed question did not survive as a substantial question of law in the appellate jurisdiction invoked, and the appeal was not entertained. en-us Tue, 11 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Mar 2019 07:43:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279355 The disputed mark-to-market loss on foreign exchange forward contracts was not restored because the issue had already been decided by an earlier Bombay HC ruling in favour of the assessee. On that basis, the proposed question did not survive as a substantial question of law in the appellate jurisdiction invoked, and the appeal was not entertained. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 11 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279355