<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1973 (8) TMI 169 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279335</link>
    <description>In an execution sale, the court must fairly and accurately set out the material particulars relevant to value in the sale proclamation and must apply its own mind rather than mechanically adopt one party&#039;s valuation. Failure to consider objections, omit important particulars, or address whether property should be sold separately or in one lot can amount to material irregularity. Where the judgment-debtors show prejudice from that irregularity, substantial injury is established and the sale may be set aside. On these facts, the sale was disturbed only as to the two bungalows and their compound, which were directed to be resold after fresh judicial consideration of the mode of sale and proclamation particulars.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2019 15:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=562662" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1973 (8) TMI 169 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279335</link>
      <description>In an execution sale, the court must fairly and accurately set out the material particulars relevant to value in the sale proclamation and must apply its own mind rather than mechanically adopt one party&#039;s valuation. Failure to consider objections, omit important particulars, or address whether property should be sold separately or in one lot can amount to material irregularity. Where the judgment-debtors show prejudice from that irregularity, substantial injury is established and the sale may be set aside. On these facts, the sale was disturbed only as to the two bungalows and their compound, which were directed to be resold after fresh judicial consideration of the mode of sale and proclamation particulars.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279335</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>