<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1975 (8) TMI 145 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279331</link>
    <description>Misfeasance liability under company law is personal to the delinquent director or officer and, absent express statutory authority, cannot be enforced against heirs or legal representatives by substitution in the proceeding. The text notes that while a declaration of liability may sometimes survive death, compulsive enforcement against the deceased director&#039;s estate through substitution is not warranted. It also states that an order directing such substitution in winding-up proceedings is not a mere procedural step: it raises a jurisdictional question, has sufficient finality on the liability issue, and is therefore appealable as a judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2019 12:47:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=562651" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1975 (8) TMI 145 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279331</link>
      <description>Misfeasance liability under company law is personal to the delinquent director or officer and, absent express statutory authority, cannot be enforced against heirs or legal representatives by substitution in the proceeding. The text notes that while a declaration of liability may sometimes survive death, compulsive enforcement against the deceased director&#039;s estate through substitution is not warranted. It also states that an order directing such substitution in winding-up proceedings is not a mere procedural step: it raises a jurisdictional question, has sufficient finality on the liability issue, and is therefore appealable as a judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279331</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>