<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (4) TMI 47 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17265</link>
    <description>The court quashed the order dated July 19, 1989, finding it based on irrelevant considerations. The appropriate authority was directed to issue a certificate of &quot;no objection&quot; under section 269UL(3) of the Act within two months. The court emphasized that if no order for purchase is made within the specified period, the appropriate authority must issue a no objection certificate to prevent financial loss to the parties. The petition was disposed of with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:26:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56265" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (4) TMI 47 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17265</link>
      <description>The court quashed the order dated July 19, 1989, finding it based on irrelevant considerations. The appropriate authority was directed to issue a certificate of &quot;no objection&quot; under section 269UL(3) of the Act within two months. The court emphasized that if no order for purchase is made within the specified period, the appropriate authority must issue a no objection certificate to prevent financial loss to the parties. The petition was disposed of with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17265</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>