<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (9) TMI 880 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279326</link>
    <description>Section 100 CPC makes the High Court&#039;s satisfaction that a substantial question of law exists the basis for admitting a second appeal, while the respondent&#039;s opportunity to argue that no such question arises is reserved for the hearing under Section 100(5). Order 41 Rule 11 permits hearing the appellant and dismissing the appeal without notice to the respondent, and Rule 12 applies only if the appeal is not dismissed under Rule 11. The statutory scheme therefore does not confer a right of audience on the respondent at the stage of formulating substantial questions of law, and inherent powers cannot be used to alter that arrangement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2019 11:45:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=562643" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (9) TMI 880 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279326</link>
      <description>Section 100 CPC makes the High Court&#039;s satisfaction that a substantial question of law exists the basis for admitting a second appeal, while the respondent&#039;s opportunity to argue that no such question arises is reserved for the hearing under Section 100(5). Order 41 Rule 11 permits hearing the appellant and dismissing the appeal without notice to the respondent, and Rule 12 applies only if the appeal is not dismissed under Rule 11. The statutory scheme therefore does not confer a right of audience on the respondent at the stage of formulating substantial questions of law, and inherent powers cannot be used to alter that arrangement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279326</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>