<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 649 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376628</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition, upholding the AAR&#039;s decision that Petitioner No. 1 was not entitled to carry forward accumulated losses under Section 74 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, due to non-compliance with the statutory requirements of filing a return of income. The ruling clarified that the decision would not affect the individual claims of the three series (funds) if they are otherwise entitled to carry forward losses under the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2020 16:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=562618" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 649 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376628</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition, upholding the AAR&#039;s decision that Petitioner No. 1 was not entitled to carry forward accumulated losses under Section 74 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, due to non-compliance with the statutory requirements of filing a return of income. The ruling clarified that the decision would not affect the individual claims of the three series (funds) if they are otherwise entitled to carry forward losses under the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376628</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>