<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 644 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376623</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty of Rs. 90,000 imposed under section 158BFA(2) of the Income Tax Act for an undisclosed investment of Rs. 1,50,000 related to hundies found during a search at the assessee&#039;s premises. The appeal challenging the penalty was dismissed, with the Tribunal finding the investment to be unaccounted for, leading to the confirmation of the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 11:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=562613" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 644 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376623</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty of Rs. 90,000 imposed under section 158BFA(2) of the Income Tax Act for an undisclosed investment of Rs. 1,50,000 related to hundies found during a search at the assessee&#039;s premises. The appeal challenging the penalty was dismissed, with the Tribunal finding the investment to be unaccounted for, leading to the confirmation of the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376623</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>