<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 641 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376620</link>
    <description>Penalty under section 271(1)(b) was not attracted because the assessee had filed replies and the record showed compliance with the section 142(1) notices dated 07.10.2016, 31.10.2016 and 08.11.2016. As the levy depends on failure to comply with a valid notice, the factual foundation for penalty was absent, and the penalty was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2019 09:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=562610" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 641 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376620</link>
      <description>Penalty under section 271(1)(b) was not attracted because the assessee had filed replies and the record showed compliance with the section 142(1) notices dated 07.10.2016, 31.10.2016 and 08.11.2016. As the levy depends on failure to comply with a valid notice, the factual foundation for penalty was absent, and the penalty was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376620</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>