<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 639 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376618</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the appellant&#039;s appeal, affirming the lower authorities&#039; decision that exemption under Sec 54G was not applicable as the transfer did not meet the requirement of moving from an urban to a non-urban area. The court emphasized the legislative intent of promoting industrialization in underdeveloped non-urban areas and concluded that the appellant failed to satisfy the primary condition for the exemption. The judgment was delivered on 08/03/2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2019 09:16:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=562608" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 639 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376618</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the appellant&#039;s appeal, affirming the lower authorities&#039; decision that exemption under Sec 54G was not applicable as the transfer did not meet the requirement of moving from an urban to a non-urban area. The court emphasized the legislative intent of promoting industrialization in underdeveloped non-urban areas and concluded that the appellant failed to satisfy the primary condition for the exemption. The judgment was delivered on 08/03/2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376618</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>