<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 632 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376611</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing the importance of cross-examination and adherence to natural justice principles. The case was remitted to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration, stressing the need for factual evidence and proper examination in determining the legitimacy of capital gains claims. The Tribunal highlighted the significance of thorough review of transactions and previous directions in similar cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2019 08:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=562600" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 632 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376611</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing the importance of cross-examination and adherence to natural justice principles. The case was remitted to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration, stressing the need for factual evidence and proper examination in determining the legitimacy of capital gains claims. The Tribunal highlighted the significance of thorough review of transactions and previous directions in similar cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376611</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>