https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376602 The applications for restoration of two appeals were rejected by the Tribunal due to the applicant's lack of diligence in updating their address with the Registry and failure to seek legal representation promptly. The Tribunal emphasized that while the right to representation by counsel is important, it does not guarantee the right to be heard, and principles of natural justice have limits. The judgment distinguished this case from others cited by the applicant's counsel, highlighting the issue as the applicant's failure to protect their interests adequately. Consequently, the applications for restoration were denied based on procedural non-compliance and lack of diligence. en-us Mon, 11 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Mar 2019 08:13:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376602 The applications for restoration of two appeals were rejected by the Tribunal due to the applicant's lack of diligence in updating their address with the Registry and failure to seek legal representation promptly. The Tribunal emphasized that while the right to representation by counsel is important, it does not guarantee the right to be heard, and principles of natural justice have limits. The judgment distinguished this case from others cited by the applicant's counsel, highlighting the issue as the applicant's failure to protect their interests adequately. Consequently, the applications for restoration were denied based on procedural non-compliance and lack of diligence. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 11 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376602