<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 615 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376594</link>
    <description>The Tribunal recalled the Final Order to rectify errors in the case involving the levy of service tax under Business Auxiliary Services (BAS) on overriding commission and the disallowance of CENVAT Credit on input services. The errors stemmed from inaccurately narrated facts related to a different case, prompting the need for rectification. The appeal was scheduled for re-hearing to address the identified mistakes and ensure a fair resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2019 07:51:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=562577" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 615 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376594</link>
      <description>The Tribunal recalled the Final Order to rectify errors in the case involving the levy of service tax under Business Auxiliary Services (BAS) on overriding commission and the disallowance of CENVAT Credit on input services. The errors stemmed from inaccurately narrated facts related to a different case, prompting the need for rectification. The appeal was scheduled for re-hearing to address the identified mistakes and ensure a fair resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376594</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>