<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 608 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376587</link>
    <description>Printed thermal paper rolls used in ATMs were held classifiable under Chapter 48, not Chapter 49, because the decisive test was whether the printing was merely incidental to the goods&#039; primary use. Chapter Note 12 to Chapter 48 treats paper printed with motifs, characters or pictorial representations as Chapter 49 only where the printing is not incidental. Here, the rolls were designed for ATM use and to print transaction details, while the bank name, logo and similar markings served only identification. Authorities on printed labels and lottery tickets were distinguished, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal succeeded, with the Commissioner (Appeals) order set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2020 15:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=562567" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 608 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376587</link>
      <description>Printed thermal paper rolls used in ATMs were held classifiable under Chapter 48, not Chapter 49, because the decisive test was whether the printing was merely incidental to the goods&#039; primary use. Chapter Note 12 to Chapter 48 treats paper printed with motifs, characters or pictorial representations as Chapter 49 only where the printing is not incidental. Here, the rolls were designed for ATM use and to print transaction details, while the bank name, logo and similar markings served only identification. Authorities on printed labels and lottery tickets were distinguished, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal succeeded, with the Commissioner (Appeals) order set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376587</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>