<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (12) TMI 16 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17256</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, directing the Tribunal to determine the cost of acquisition and value of bonus shares using the fair market value as of January 1, 1954, for both original and bonus shares. The court emphasized that deviating from this method would violate Section 55(2) of the Income-tax Act and established judicial precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:48:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56256" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (12) TMI 16 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17256</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, directing the Tribunal to determine the cost of acquisition and value of bonus shares using the fair market value as of January 1, 1954, for both original and bonus shares. The court emphasized that deviating from this method would violate Section 55(2) of the Income-tax Act and established judicial precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17256</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>