<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Arbitration Clause Requiring 10% Pre-Deposit Hinders Access to Alternative Dispute Resolution, Contradicts Court Burden Reduction Goals.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=45103</link>
    <description>Arbitration agreement - Deterring a party to an arbitration from invoking this alternative dispute resolution process by a pre-deposit of 10% would discourage arbitration, contrary to the object of de-clogging the Court system, and would render the arbitral process ineffective and expensive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2019 07:29:30 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2019 07:29:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=562557" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Arbitration Clause Requiring 10% Pre-Deposit Hinders Access to Alternative Dispute Resolution, Contradicts Court Burden Reduction Goals.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=45103</link>
      <description>Arbitration agreement - Deterring a party to an arbitration from invoking this alternative dispute resolution process by a pre-deposit of 10% would discourage arbitration, contrary to the object of de-clogging the Court system, and would render the arbitral process ineffective and expensive.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2019 07:29:30 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=45103</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>