https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279318 Mere non-preparation of a seizure memo does not, by itself, justify quashing criminal proceedings where the prosecution is otherwise supported by seized cash, witness statements, and statements recorded under Section 164 CrPC. The seizure memo is only corroborative and not substantive evidence; its omission amounts at most to an irregularity and does not vitiate the prosecution when other material is available. On that basis, the absence of a seizure memo was held insufficient to terminate the proceedings, and the quashing petition was liable to be dismissed. en-us Thu, 10 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Mar 2019 07:27:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279318 Mere non-preparation of a seizure memo does not, by itself, justify quashing criminal proceedings where the prosecution is otherwise supported by seized cash, witness statements, and statements recorded under Section 164 CrPC. The seizure memo is only corroborative and not substantive evidence; its omission amounts at most to an irregularity and does not vitiate the prosecution when other material is available. On that basis, the absence of a seizure memo was held insufficient to terminate the proceedings, and the quashing petition was liable to be dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 10 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279318