<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1619 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279323</link>
    <description>The CESTAT allowed the Revenue&#039;s application for rectification of mistakes in the Final Order, acknowledging errors in the denial of cenvat credit and the wording regarding tax liability on renting immovable property. The Final Order was modified to delete the denial of cenvat credit and state that the appeal was partly allowed. The rectifications were made based on the errors identified by the Revenue, leading to the modification of the Final Order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2019 07:27:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=562549" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1619 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279323</link>
      <description>The CESTAT allowed the Revenue&#039;s application for rectification of mistakes in the Final Order, acknowledging errors in the denial of cenvat credit and the wording regarding tax liability on renting immovable property. The Final Order was modified to delete the denial of cenvat credit and state that the appeal was partly allowed. The rectifications were made based on the errors identified by the Revenue, leading to the modification of the Final Order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279323</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>