https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279324 The court allowed the petition, setting aside the notice for reopening the assessment for the year 2012-2013. The court emphasized that the petitioner had fully disclosed the subsidy treatment during scrutiny assessment, and the Assessing Officer's objections should have been raised earlier. Reopening the assessment beyond four years was deemed impermissible under the circumstances. en-us Mon, 13 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Mar 2019 07:27:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279324 The court allowed the petition, setting aside the notice for reopening the assessment for the year 2012-2013. The court emphasized that the petitioner had fully disclosed the subsidy treatment during scrutiny assessment, and the Assessing Officer's objections should have been raised earlier. Reopening the assessment beyond four years was deemed impermissible under the circumstances. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 13 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279324