<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 1560 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279313</link>
    <description>The ITAT set aside the CWT(Appeals) orders for assessment years 2002-03 to 2007-08 regarding the valuation of immovable property, Dynasty Jewellery, jewellery, wealth outside India, and fixed deposit due to lack of proper justification and details of addition. The ITAT agreed with the assessee&#039;s counsel, referencing previous ITAT orders and pending civil suits affecting inheritance disputes, and ordered fresh adjudication post civil suit decisions for all the assessed items.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 17:45:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=562522" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 1560 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279313</link>
      <description>The ITAT set aside the CWT(Appeals) orders for assessment years 2002-03 to 2007-08 regarding the valuation of immovable property, Dynasty Jewellery, jewellery, wealth outside India, and fixed deposit due to lack of proper justification and details of addition. The ITAT agreed with the assessee&#039;s counsel, referencing previous ITAT orders and pending civil suits affecting inheritance disputes, and ordered fresh adjudication post civil suit decisions for all the assessed items.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279313</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>