https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279302 A contractual clause expressly barring overrun charges prevents an arbitral tribunal from allowing that claim, and the disallowance was affirmed. Deduction of crane charges for unit III was held unauthorised because the agreement limited crane facilities to unit II and there was no contractual or contemporaneous authority for the deduction; refund was therefore due. A bar on interest did not eliminate the power to award pendente lite interest or interest on judgment, which was treated as consistent with Section 34 of the Code of Civil Procedure. en-us Wed, 12 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Mar 2019 13:14:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279302 A contractual clause expressly barring overrun charges prevents an arbitral tribunal from allowing that claim, and the disallowance was affirmed. Deduction of crane charges for unit III was held unauthorised because the agreement limited crane facilities to unit II and there was no contractual or contemporaneous authority for the deduction; refund was therefore due. A bar on interest did not eliminate the power to award pendente lite interest or interest on judgment, which was treated as consistent with Section 34 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 12 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279302