<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 597 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376576</link>
    <description>TDS classification of payments to a pest control agency and to full-time consultant doctors is analysed: payments to the pest control agency were held not to be for technical services, therefore not taxable as professional fees. For consultant doctors the court applied the bilateral contractual relationship test and factors from Grant Medical Foundation, noting fixed/variable remuneration, profit share (15%/85%), one-year renewable contracts, absence of employment benefits, and requirement for doctors to obtain their own indemnity insurance; these indicia supported non-employee status for tax deduction purposes, and no question of law arises.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 18:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=562476" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 597 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376576</link>
      <description>TDS classification of payments to a pest control agency and to full-time consultant doctors is analysed: payments to the pest control agency were held not to be for technical services, therefore not taxable as professional fees. For consultant doctors the court applied the bilateral contractual relationship test and factors from Grant Medical Foundation, noting fixed/variable remuneration, profit share (15%/85%), one-year renewable contracts, absence of employment benefits, and requirement for doctors to obtain their own indemnity insurance; these indicia supported non-employee status for tax deduction purposes, and no question of law arises.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376576</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>