https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376569 The Court found that the authorities violated the principle of natural justice by not allowing the petitioner to be heard before demanding the entire tax amount. The Court directed the petitioner to apply for a stay with the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, depositing 20% of the tax demand. The Principal Commissioner was to decide on the stay application after hearing the petitioner's representative. No further recoveries were permitted until the stay application was decided. Failure to comply would allow the Department to proceed with further recoveries, while the petitioner's bank account was to be released immediately. en-us Thu, 07 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Mar 2019 08:16:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376569 The Court found that the authorities violated the principle of natural justice by not allowing the petitioner to be heard before demanding the entire tax amount. The Court directed the petitioner to apply for a stay with the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, depositing 20% of the tax demand. The Principal Commissioner was to decide on the stay application after hearing the petitioner's representative. No further recoveries were permitted until the stay application was decided. Failure to comply would allow the Department to proceed with further recoveries, while the petitioner's bank account was to be released immediately. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 07 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376569