https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376566 The appeal challenged the disallowance of expenditure under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which was restricted by the CIT(A) and upheld by the Tribunal. The issue regarding foreign travel expenses for the chairman's wife as a business expenditure was dismissed by the Tribunal, considering her role in the company. The disallowance of employee's contribution to the provident fund was supported by legal precedent, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. The Tribunal's decision was affirmed, and all three issues raised in the case were dismissed. en-us Wed, 06 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Mar 2019 08:16:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376566 The appeal challenged the disallowance of expenditure under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which was restricted by the CIT(A) and upheld by the Tribunal. The issue regarding foreign travel expenses for the chairman's wife as a business expenditure was dismissed by the Tribunal, considering her role in the company. The disallowance of employee's contribution to the provident fund was supported by legal precedent, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. The Tribunal's decision was affirmed, and all three issues raised in the case were dismissed. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 06 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376566