<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 575 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376554</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, canceling the penalty under section 271(1)(c) for the assessment year 2010-2011. The Tribunal held that the penalty was not justified as no incriminating material was found during the search, and the addition to income was due to a deeming provision, not concealment. The assessing officer&#039;s acceptance of the return without mentioning any incriminating material indicated no concealment, leading to the cancellation of the penalty orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 08:15:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=562443" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 575 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376554</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, canceling the penalty under section 271(1)(c) for the assessment year 2010-2011. The Tribunal held that the penalty was not justified as no incriminating material was found during the search, and the addition to income was due to a deeming provision, not concealment. The assessing officer&#039;s acceptance of the return without mentioning any incriminating material indicated no concealment, leading to the cancellation of the penalty orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376554</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>