https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376525 The Court closed the writ petition challenging the classification of goods for tax purposes under different entries of the KVAT Act, 2003. The petitioner, a trader of water and sanitary equipment, sought a lower tax rate under entry 3(2) of Schedule III, while the Revenue argued for a higher tax rate under entry 101 of SRO 82 of 2006. The Court acknowledged the potential merit in the petitioner's case but emphasized the need to exhaust statutory remedies before approaching the Court. The petitioner was allowed to pursue the available appellate authority under the KVAT Act, with a two-week deferment of coercive actions granted by the Court. en-us Tue, 26 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Mar 2019 07:46:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376525 The Court closed the writ petition challenging the classification of goods for tax purposes under different entries of the KVAT Act, 2003. The petitioner, a trader of water and sanitary equipment, sought a lower tax rate under entry 3(2) of Schedule III, while the Revenue argued for a higher tax rate under entry 101 of SRO 82 of 2006. The Court acknowledged the potential merit in the petitioner's case but emphasized the need to exhaust statutory remedies before approaching the Court. The petitioner was allowed to pursue the available appellate authority under the KVAT Act, with a two-week deferment of coercive actions granted by the Court. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 26 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376525