<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 1405 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279290</link>
    <description>The Tribunal addressed challenges to the reopening of assessments for multiple years, focusing on the Assessing Officer&#039;s authority to make additions beyond the reopened issues. An additional ground of appeal regarding jurisdiction was allowed for one assessment year. The interpretation of &quot;and also&quot; in section 147 of the IT Act was clarified, restricting additions to issues for which assessments were reopened. Revenue&#039;s appeals below Rs. 10 lakhs were dismissed, and the validity of proceedings under section 147 was partially upheld. The Tribunal resolved issues on expenses and unaccounted sales, considering legal interpretations and evidence presented.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 07:43:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=562401" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 1405 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279290</link>
      <description>The Tribunal addressed challenges to the reopening of assessments for multiple years, focusing on the Assessing Officer&#039;s authority to make additions beyond the reopened issues. An additional ground of appeal regarding jurisdiction was allowed for one assessment year. The interpretation of &quot;and also&quot; in section 147 of the IT Act was clarified, restricting additions to issues for which assessments were reopened. Revenue&#039;s appeals below Rs. 10 lakhs were dismissed, and the validity of proceedings under section 147 was partially upheld. The Tribunal resolved issues on expenses and unaccounted sales, considering legal interpretations and evidence presented.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279290</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>