<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1435 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279293</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to re-determine the eligible deduction under Section 54F, focusing on the extent of land appurtenant to the residential house. The Tribunal emphasized following High Court guidelines and providing the assessee with adequate opportunity. The revenue&#039;s appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 07:43:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=562396" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1435 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279293</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to re-determine the eligible deduction under Section 54F, focusing on the extent of land appurtenant to the residential house. The Tribunal emphasized following High Court guidelines and providing the assessee with adequate opportunity. The revenue&#039;s appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279293</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>