<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 543 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376522</link>
    <description>The Court determined that the Full Time Consultant Doctors had a professional relationship with the hospital, not an employer-employee one, under the Income Tax Act. Payments to doctors were classified as professional fees under Sec.194J, not subject to tax deduction under Sec.192. The Court upheld this decision based on contractual terms, lack of employee benefits, and the doctors&#039; autonomy. Additionally, payments for maintenance contracts were correctly classified under Sec.194C, not Sec.194J, as they were for maintenance and repair services. All Income Tax Appeals were dismissed, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2020 15:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=562392" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 543 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376522</link>
      <description>The Court determined that the Full Time Consultant Doctors had a professional relationship with the hospital, not an employer-employee one, under the Income Tax Act. Payments to doctors were classified as professional fees under Sec.194J, not subject to tax deduction under Sec.192. The Court upheld this decision based on contractual terms, lack of employee benefits, and the doctors&#039; autonomy. Additionally, payments for maintenance contracts were correctly classified under Sec.194C, not Sec.194J, as they were for maintenance and repair services. All Income Tax Appeals were dismissed, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376522</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>