https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279288 A pawnee's right to sell pledged property is a distinct remedy and is not merely accessory to the personal action against the debtor. The majority held that the proprietary remedy may survive even where personal liability is barred, and that separate limitation rules apply: Article 120 governs the claim against the pledged property, while Article 57 governs the personal claim against the debtor. The dissent took the opposite view, treating the sale remedy as incidental to the debt and not maintainable as an independent suit once the personal claim was time-barred. en-us Fri, 12 Dec 1902 00:00:00 +0521 Mon, 11 Mar 2019 18:39:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279288 A pawnee's right to sell pledged property is a distinct remedy and is not merely accessory to the personal action against the debtor. The majority held that the proprietary remedy may survive even where personal liability is barred, and that separate limitation rules apply: Article 120 governs the claim against the pledged property, while Article 57 governs the personal claim against the debtor. The dissent took the opposite view, treating the sale remedy as incidental to the debt and not maintainable as an independent suit once the personal claim was time-barred. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 12 Dec 1902 00:00:00 +0521 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279288