https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279286 In disputes over a wife's property, a husband who admits receiving her securities must prove that any transfer was a bona fide sale for full value, especially where the wife is purdah-nusheen; absent a clear explanation and in light of surrounding circumstances, the claim fails. A claim omitted from an earlier suit is barred even if the omission was accidental, where the omitted item forms part of the same demand and cause of action. A Muslim husband's suit for restitution of conjugal rights is maintainable in civil court and must be decided under Mahomedan law; the wife may raise cruelty or substantial marital default as a defence, but such allegations must be legally proved. en-us Sat, 16 Feb 1867 00:00:00 +0553 Mon, 11 Mar 2019 18:27:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279286 In disputes over a wife's property, a husband who admits receiving her securities must prove that any transfer was a bona fide sale for full value, especially where the wife is purdah-nusheen; absent a clear explanation and in light of surrounding circumstances, the claim fails. A claim omitted from an earlier suit is barred even if the omission was accidental, where the omitted item forms part of the same demand and cause of action. A Muslim husband's suit for restitution of conjugal rights is maintainable in civil court and must be decided under Mahomedan law; the wife may raise cruelty or substantial marital default as a defence, but such allegations must be legally proved. Case-Laws Indian Laws Sat, 16 Feb 1867 00:00:00 +0553 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279286