https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279282 A substituted settlement agreement operating as accord and satisfaction extinguished the parties' prior rights and replaced them with new obligations under the receipt. Section 34 of the Ceylon Civil Procedure Act was construed as barring only subsequent claims or remedies arising from the same cause of action, not a later suit founded on a distinct and inconsistent settlement-based obligation. A claim on promissory notes was treated as separate from a claim for the amount found due under the settlement, so the suit was not barred and the amount recoverable under the settlement could be enforced. en-us Tue, 16 Dec 1913 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Mar 2019 17:18:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279282 A substituted settlement agreement operating as accord and satisfaction extinguished the parties' prior rights and replaced them with new obligations under the receipt. Section 34 of the Ceylon Civil Procedure Act was construed as barring only subsequent claims or remedies arising from the same cause of action, not a later suit founded on a distinct and inconsistent settlement-based obligation. A claim on promissory notes was treated as separate from a claim for the amount found due under the settlement, so the suit was not barred and the amount recoverable under the settlement could be enforced. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 16 Dec 1913 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279282