https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279275 Contraband recovered incidentally during a search initiated on information about illicit liquor was treated as a chance recovery, so the narcotic-law safeguards tied to prior information about narcotics were not attracted; the first appellant's conviction was therefore sustained. The second appellant's conviction could not stand because the record did not show knowledge, conscious possession, or participation in carrying the contraband, and mere presence in the auto rickshaw was insufficient; he was entitled to acquittal. The challenge thus succeeded only in part. en-us Wed, 16 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 15 Jul 2024 18:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279275 Contraband recovered incidentally during a search initiated on information about illicit liquor was treated as a chance recovery, so the narcotic-law safeguards tied to prior information about narcotics were not attracted; the first appellant's conviction was therefore sustained. The second appellant's conviction could not stand because the record did not show knowledge, conscious possession, or participation in carrying the contraband, and mere presence in the auto rickshaw was insufficient; he was entitled to acquittal. The challenge thus succeeded only in part. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 16 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279275