https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279270 The court dismissed the writ petitions seeking adjustment of payments received through encashed Bank Guarantees on a First In First Out basis. The court held that the disputes involving contractual matters with BSNL and MTNL were not suitable for writ jurisdiction due to the existence of an arbitration clause. Emphasizing the need to adhere to contractual terms and pursue resolution through appropriate legal avenues, the court ruled that the complex issues should be addressed through civil suits or arbitral proceedings rather than through writ jurisdiction. The judgment set a precedent for handling contractual disputes and the exercise of writ jurisdiction. en-us Tue, 20 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 Mar 2019 11:12:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279270 The court dismissed the writ petitions seeking adjustment of payments received through encashed Bank Guarantees on a First In First Out basis. The court held that the disputes involving contractual matters with BSNL and MTNL were not suitable for writ jurisdiction due to the existence of an arbitration clause. Emphasizing the need to adhere to contractual terms and pursue resolution through appropriate legal avenues, the court ruled that the complex issues should be addressed through civil suits or arbitral proceedings rather than through writ jurisdiction. The judgment set a precedent for handling contractual disputes and the exercise of writ jurisdiction. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 20 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279270