<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 524 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376503</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeal)&#039;s order classifying imported Kapok under heading 1404 and remanded the matter for redetermination. Emphasizing adherence to the Show Cause Notice&#039;s scope and classification principles, the Tribunal directed a reevaluation within four months. The Commissioner (Appeal) was instructed to consider all evidence and determine whether the Kapok was primarily used in textiles for correct classification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 06:45:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=562290" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 524 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376503</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeal)&#039;s order classifying imported Kapok under heading 1404 and remanded the matter for redetermination. Emphasizing adherence to the Show Cause Notice&#039;s scope and classification principles, the Tribunal directed a reevaluation within four months. The Commissioner (Appeal) was instructed to consider all evidence and determine whether the Kapok was primarily used in textiles for correct classification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376503</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>