<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 519 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376498</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision denying input service credit for GTA services post-01.4.2008, remanding the matter for re-adjudication. Emphasizing the need for a detailed factual examination, the Court referenced relevant precedents and directed the Adjudicating Authority to consider these before providing a fresh decision. The appeals were allowed, leaving substantial legal questions open for future determination, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2019 09:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=562285" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 519 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376498</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision denying input service credit for GTA services post-01.4.2008, remanding the matter for re-adjudication. Emphasizing the need for a detailed factual examination, the Court referenced relevant precedents and directed the Adjudicating Authority to consider these before providing a fresh decision. The appeals were allowed, leaving substantial legal questions open for future determination, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376498</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>