<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 511 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376490</link>
    <description>Limitation, revenue neutrality and penalty sustainment arise in an appeal before CESTAT. The issues concern whether the appeal should succeed on limitation, whether revenue neutrality precludes invocation of the extended limitation period, and whether penalty remains sustainable. Differing Member views led to referral of these questions to the President for determination by a third Member; no final resolution on the merits is recorded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 06:45:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=562277" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 511 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376490</link>
      <description>Limitation, revenue neutrality and penalty sustainment arise in an appeal before CESTAT. The issues concern whether the appeal should succeed on limitation, whether revenue neutrality precludes invocation of the extended limitation period, and whether penalty remains sustainable. Differing Member views led to referral of these questions to the President for determination by a third Member; no final resolution on the merits is recorded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376490</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>