<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 505 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376484</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, canceling the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act. The decision was based on the lack of evidence supporting the concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The Tribunal emphasized the need for concrete evidence before imposing penalties for tax evasion, following the legal precedent set by the Hon&#039;ble Supreme Court in Reliance Petro Products Pvt. Ltd.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 06:44:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=562270" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 505 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376484</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, canceling the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act. The decision was based on the lack of evidence supporting the concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The Tribunal emphasized the need for concrete evidence before imposing penalties for tax evasion, following the legal precedent set by the Hon&#039;ble Supreme Court in Reliance Petro Products Pvt. Ltd.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376484</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>