<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (7) TMI 2 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17226</link>
    <description>The High Court of Karnataka ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the disallowance of salary paid to partners representing their Hindu undivided family under section 40(b). The decision aligned with a previous Division Bench judgment and answered a common question referred by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 11:30:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56226" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (7) TMI 2 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17226</link>
      <description>The High Court of Karnataka ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the disallowance of salary paid to partners representing their Hindu undivided family under section 40(b). The decision aligned with a previous Division Bench judgment and answered a common question referred by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17226</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>