https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279265 The Rajasthan HC held that cancellation of a mining lease transfer permission could not rest on minor pre-transfer irregularities such as stamp papers purchased before incorporation, affidavits and resolution filed after the application, or delayed registration of the transfer deed, because these did not invalidate the transfer request or the permission granted. It further held that a post-transfer change in shareholding, by itself, did not prove direct or indirect financing or substantial control by another person so as to trigger the transfer prohibition under the mining rules. The impugned order was also found to lack reasons and to fall short of fair decision-making, so the cancellation was unsustainable. en-us Wed, 25 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 Mar 2019 06:17:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279265 The Rajasthan HC held that cancellation of a mining lease transfer permission could not rest on minor pre-transfer irregularities such as stamp papers purchased before incorporation, affidavits and resolution filed after the application, or delayed registration of the transfer deed, because these did not invalidate the transfer request or the permission granted. It further held that a post-transfer change in shareholding, by itself, did not prove direct or indirect financing or substantial control by another person so as to trigger the transfer prohibition under the mining rules. The impugned order was also found to lack reasons and to fall short of fair decision-making, so the cancellation was unsustainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 25 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279265