https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376467 A writ petition challenged a GST-related notice and the continued enforcement of the Kerala Value Added Tax regime after the GST transition, arguing that the State GST saving provisions were inconsistent with the Constitution Amendment framework and therefore unconstitutional. The court noted that counsel agreed the issue was already covered against the petitioner by an earlier decision in connected matters. Applying that earlier ratio, the petition was dismissed. The text reflects dispute over transition, saving provisions, and constitutional validity rather than a fresh independent determination of those issues. en-us Fri, 01 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Mar 2025 17:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376467 A writ petition challenged a GST-related notice and the continued enforcement of the Kerala Value Added Tax regime after the GST transition, arguing that the State GST saving provisions were inconsistent with the Constitution Amendment framework and therefore unconstitutional. The court noted that counsel agreed the issue was already covered against the petitioner by an earlier decision in connected matters. Applying that earlier ratio, the petition was dismissed. The text reflects dispute over transition, saving provisions, and constitutional validity rather than a fresh independent determination of those issues. Case-Laws GST Fri, 01 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376467