<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 481 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376460</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, acknowledging the genuine sources of the wife&#039;s income but requiring further substantiation of the deposited amount to justify the addition under section 69. The Tribunal allowed a partial relief of Rs. 3,00,000 from the total addition upheld by the lower authorities, emphasizing the need for complete establishment of the source of cash deposits in the bank account.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2019 07:51:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=562190" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 481 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376460</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, acknowledging the genuine sources of the wife&#039;s income but requiring further substantiation of the deposited amount to justify the addition under section 69. The Tribunal allowed a partial relief of Rs. 3,00,000 from the total addition upheld by the lower authorities, emphasizing the need for complete establishment of the source of cash deposits in the bank account.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376460</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>