<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 474 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376453</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision on the deduction u/s 80HHC, remanding the matter for verification of the export house&#039;s profits. Subsequently, the assessee was found entitled to the deduction, subject to quantification by the Assessing Officer. Regarding the claim u/s 10A, the Court ruled that the assessee could not claim for exports involving IQF but was entitled for other exports. The issue was referred back to the Assessing Officer to compute deductions without overlap between u/s 10A and 80HHC. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, clarifying the eligibility criteria for tax deductions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2019 11:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=562181" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 474 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376453</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision on the deduction u/s 80HHC, remanding the matter for verification of the export house&#039;s profits. Subsequently, the assessee was found entitled to the deduction, subject to quantification by the Assessing Officer. Regarding the claim u/s 10A, the Court ruled that the assessee could not claim for exports involving IQF but was entitled for other exports. The issue was referred back to the Assessing Officer to compute deductions without overlap between u/s 10A and 80HHC. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, clarifying the eligibility criteria for tax deductions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376453</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>